When I was a teenager, my friend and I were building a magic system and got into an extended debate. I wanted the most elegant system possible; something that was beautifully parallel, consistent all the way to the top, fully explained, organized. He wanted something more
-
-
-understand, because it was so heavily pattern based. Because it was my brain that planned and predicted it, it was necessarily limited by what I could comprehend. It lost complexity. His approach, for what it sacrificed in predictability, made up for in complexity.
Show this thread -
No rule was absolute; nuance was huge; it was not easily understandable, and in this it was closer to a living being. I nowadays try to approach things as a balance between his old view and my old view. When operating with large-scale principles, whether it be economics or
Show this thread -
morality, recognize that they're limited in their use. Reality is not simple, and whatever system you're using to categorize it is necessarily going to miss the nuance and "living-beingness" of what's going on. Ofc I don't mean don't use principle at all - only recognize that
Show this thread -
principles are a necessarily simplifying *tool* that you are using for *specific purposes*, and be prepared to loosen your grip on that tool whenever reality gives you a concept that isn't quite so elegantly manipulated by that tool.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.