body { -ms-overflow-style: scrollbar; overflow-y: scroll; overscroll-behavior-y: none; } .errorContainer { background-color: #FFF; color: #0F1419; max-width: 600px; margin: 0 auto; padding: 10%; font-family: Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; } .errorButton { margin: 3em 0; } .errorButton a { background: #1DA1F2; border-radius: 2.5em; color: white; padding: 1em 2em; text-decoration: none; } .errorButton a:hover, .errorButton a:focus { background: rgb(26, 145, 218); } .errorFooter { color: #657786; font-size: 80%; line-height: 1.5; padding: 1em 0; } .errorFooter a, .errorFooter a:visited { color: #657786; text-decoration: none; padding-right: 1em; } .errorFooter a:hover, .errorFooter a:active { text-decoration: underline; } #placeholder, #react-root { display: none !important; } body { background-color: #FFF !important; }

JavaScript is not available.

We’ve detected that JavaScript is disabled in this browser. Please enable JavaScript or switch to a supported browser to continue using twitter.com. You can see a list of supported browsers in our Help Center.

Terms of Service Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Imprint Ads info © 2023 Twitter, Inc.

Conversation

Assuming the government could afford it, would you support a law that gave people with severe mental illnesses a basic stipend on which to live, which would be suspended if they had kids?

Yes
39.2%
No
60.8%

1,874 votesFinal results

17

3

7

This Tweet is unavailable. Learn more

Replying to

To discourage then from having kids

2:24 AM · Feb 17, 2020

Replying to

and

But if they have severe mental illness, they're not really in control of their actions. In affect, just punishing the kids.

1

7

wokeness within the boundaries of mere reason

@_me_you_coward

Replying to

and

Because they would be bad parents? Or is this only intended for mental illnesses that are demonstrably genetic?

2