I'm pretty anti-socialist, but if you remove the use of force from socialism then... actually I love it. Assuming a world where you don't coerce anybody or violate their negative rights, then yeah. Let's have fuckin communism baby that sounds wonderful.
-
-
what? weird.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I get this thought: that tax is forced and therefore immoral - but the flip side is the force used to protect private property. Why should the principle of people owning things be protected by force - but not the principle of providing for a more equitable society?
-
Is a homeless person 'free' to buy a yacht? If not - why does a rich person's right to spend resources they control take precedence over an impoverished person's right to basic financial freedoms?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
What if we want the third, healthy, option, of participating in this? No money, just fluid dynamics, with more than enough resources for all of us living organisms to flourish, if we stop encouraging hoarding and greed, and instead encourage the creativity of being truly alive?pic.twitter.com/is5YqwMigM
End of conversation
-
-
-
Pretty much everyone except hardcore anarcho-pacifists support the use of force in some circumstances. & using your definition of force, I can't think of a single person I've ever met who wouldn't support it's use in some circumstances
-
Nope. Violence is violence, and those who understand human psychology and biology and physics think that authoritarian approaches are the dinosaurs of memes, and are going extinct. Passion, freedom, creativity, and curiosity (not peace) are the only effective ways forward.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Yeah, this is where authoritarianism gets confused with liberalism and libertarianism and even conservatism. Folks decide that the only way to get to an ideal is through harm/threats. The real deal happens naturally, when everyone is free, and not being denied their needs.pic.twitter.com/5q97RfYDuk
-
LMAO - incel shares its plot point with terrorist
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
"For example"? Blithely conflating a challenge to existing power structures with violence begs the core question: how is power in society to be distributed?
-
Wealth is power. To distribute wealth is to distribute power. Present conditions are the result of a ruling class distributing power *to itself* for at least the past four decades.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.