If you think that people who vote for the political figure you disagree with must necessarily be psychopaths, complete buffoons, idiots, brainwashed, whiny, or angrily selfish, then you should seriously reconsider like, all of your beliefs in everything
-
-
Well said. I had been "performing within the approved limits" of many people for quite a while, which basically meant I just self-censored. It drove me nuts. It's easy to make self-censorship a habit, and most don't even recognize the immense value of what they're giving up.
-
They're giving up their ability to be their authentic selves and have people like or dislike them for who they truly are. People need to learn to be OK with some people not liking them. If you're only accepted because you hide who you are, then you're not truly accepted.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Do you believe this applies to all political systems? Russia? North Korea? Myanmar? What about past ones? Rome under Caligula? At a minimum, there clearly exists a great deal if misinformation and ignorance in American politics. Not all opinions are created equal.
-
I agree that we must retain the ability to think critically, rather than being unwaveringly monolithic. But assuming both political parties in the US must be equal in morality and truth is just lazy and illogical
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Everyone is like that. Limits may be different but they exist.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Meh. Sounds quite circular. You are assuming that this assumption is wrong (it may be right in special context) & clearly attributing morality connotation w/ the slave supporter moral comparison. Methodology is important, but actual substance can't be unimportant.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Most are ignorant & greedy That mix can produce support for all kinds of horrible policy Line btwn innocent/good/evil not clear "Eat the rich" is ignorance of wealth creation used to justify greed & envy Desire for things (security or otherwise) at others expense is greed
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I believe our current president is a clear and present danger to our Democracy. I will resist any effort to normalize his corruption, immorality and mental deficiencies. It has nothing to do with taxes or policy positions. He's unfit.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Love always has limits, that's a dictate of human nature. The best we can do is continue to struggle for self-awareness, forgivement, and openness. In my world fear is a precursor to hate. If we truly want to connect we cannot perform.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Laozi and Buddha both did this ... yet are considered some of the most harmless. There are conditions where it makes sense and doesn't limit "love". When you abandon all your falsehood, the conclusion is there
-
I'm referring to the three categories of people seen on the basis of how they hear of the law of the world's operation. Laozi said if those of little virtue didnt laugh in ridicule at the Dao then it's not the dao

- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.