Generally speaking, your political affiliation leans closest to:
-
-
Definitely - but it’s abuse doesn’t constitute an existential threat every time a broken individual lights up a national forest and destroys nearby towns. Absent a global totalitarian surveillance state one these individuals only has to succeed *once* to end it all for everyone
-
there's something about this argument that 'feels' like it has a fallacy in it, like there's some intuitive tag around it, like... something like we've advanced HUGELY in tech over the last 200 years but haven't seen a proportional amount of individuals fucking over others
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.