At least in this frame, an aggressive woman is taking on traits from the male story; she is *deviating* from her story, which is why we consider an aggressive woman to be doing something weird with gender. I think we're generally very tolerant of story deviations, but we-
-
-
So genderqueer people see the wimpy king and say, "The wimpy king does not belong in the king story because he is wimpy; he belongs in the wimpy story" This seems to view the personality, or supplemental traits to the story, as defining of the story; the kingness comes from-
-
not the role people bestow on him, not the fact he commands people or might get assassinated, but on being confident or vain or aggressive; they see a king who's not confident or vain as aggressive as failing to perform the story entirely
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.