This is the most incoherent thing I’ve read in a while. There’s hardly any discussion of dysphoria or bodies but lots of talk about fashion. These people think “gender identity” is something akin to the soul but the way they talk about it is pure style.https://www.teenvogue.com/story/trans-masculine-non-binary-conversation-affirmation-identity-beauty …
I'm not saying they *can't*; I'm trying to balance "maybe these people are onto some legitimately 100% new sense" vs "maybe they're engaging in a frame that's not inherent and can be critiqued" is hard to know
-
-
Funny, because when I hear you seeking to characterize their identities as pathological because they aren't ones you understand or don't experience, I'm not sure I hear where you're not saying "can't". They're not new. They're new to you. It's not you being skeptical.
-
Should we take at face value the "skepticism" that homophobes show when they insist gayness is a new fad, isn't natural, & just indicates a history of sexual trauma? Because that's a standard homophobic trope. Are these homophobes just "skeptical" because gay people confuse them?
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.