That is your interpretation of the question. I wonder what you were thinking about. This lady on the other hand is doing research on taboos. So that seems a valid question to get some results, no?
-
-
Thanks for the clarification. So are you simply asking about the origins of the taboo and why it seems to hurt the animals involved?
-
I was asking about the origins of the taboo, yes. I wasn't asking about why it seems to hurt the animals... it seems to depend a lot on the animal? And when it does hurt it seems obvious why it hurts (physical damage)? I guess I find that question less interesting.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
how do u believe in "harm reduction" if ur a nihilist? how does do u disapprove of harm n at the same time hold the belief that nothing matters or exists or has value/meaning?
-
Meta-ethical vs object-ethical... people are allowed to be complicated
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.