Conversation

Also, a large amount of responses to my tweet (which, as a reminder, was asking about evolutionary basis for the cultural taboo of bestiality) used 'white' in a derrogatory sense. Which, are they implying that non-white people are less curious? Or just less curious about taboos?

178

This Tweet is from a suspended account. Learn more

Replying to

where the hell did i say bestiality isn't bad

This Tweet is from a suspended account. Learn more

Replying to

what? I mean i literally research taboos, like here: knowingless.com/2017/07/03/sex I ask a ton of questions about all kind of fetishes, what part of my research here is oblivious

knowingless.com

How Taboo Are These Sexual Fetishes?

click here for full size The correlation between tabooness and sexual interest was statistically significant at p < 0.01. If you’d like to join the email list to get notified about …

Replying to

and

but most people dont know who you are or why youre asking, they just see that tweet with no context, and the way you worded the questions about beastiality made it seem like you were okay with it, and didnt understand why others werent.

Replying to

and

Yeah I didn't expect that tweet to get shared widely outside of my Twitter followers. If I'd known that I would have put in more disclaimers.

This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more

Aella

@Aella_Girl

that's not what i said. I said I didn't know it would get shared widely. Nearly every single one of my tweets doesn't get shared widely. I thought this would be like every other day of my life on twitter.

7:21 PM · Jan 20, 2020

Likes

This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more

Aella

@Aella_Girl

Jan 20, 2020

I'm not shocked. Someone asked why I didn't put in disclaimers, and I said it's because I didn't expect it to get shared widely. But sometimes getting shared widely happens, and then I wish I'd put in disclaimers. I am aware that it was a risk.