body { -ms-overflow-style: scrollbar; overflow-y: scroll; overscroll-behavior-y: none; } .errorContainer { background-color: #FFF; color: #0F1419; max-width: 600px; margin: 0 auto; padding: 10%; font-family: Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; } .errorButton { margin: 3em 0; } .errorButton a { background: #1DA1F2; border-radius: 2.5em; color: white; padding: 1em 2em; text-decoration: none; } .errorButton a:hover, .errorButton a:focus { background: rgb(26, 145, 218); } .errorFooter { color: #657786; font-size: 80%; line-height: 1.5; padding: 1em 0; } .errorFooter a, .errorFooter a:visited { color: #657786; text-decoration: none; padding-right: 1em; } .errorFooter a:hover, .errorFooter a:active { text-decoration: underline; } #placeholder, #react-root { display: none !important; } body { background-color: #FFF !important; }

JavaScript is not available.

We’ve detected that JavaScript is disabled in this browser. Please enable JavaScript or switch to a supported browser to continue using twitter.com. You can see a list of supported browsers in our Help Center.

Terms of Service Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Imprint Ads info © 2023 Twitter, Inc.

Conversation

Is bestiality wrong due to the inability of animals to consent? || Are you a vegan?

Yes | Yes
6.3%
Yes | No
62.1%
No | Yes
2%
No | No
29.6%

14,401 votesFinal results

191

97

76

Replying to

Vegan here: depends on the situation, in certain situations yeah. Sucking a gorillas dick more or less requires it's consent to be performed, it'll stop you if it wants to. If an animal has the power to stop you, I'd argue they're consenting, if not it's rape.

1

1

Replying to

and

As humans we use verbal consent. An animal cannot participate in verbal consent

2

1

This Tweet is from a suspended account. Learn more

Replying to

@qwertyplication

and

I didn't murder anyone

2

This Tweet is from a suspended account. Learn more

Replying to

@qwertyplication

and

No human ever has murdered an animal. Animals don't possess personhood and can't be murdered

2

1

Replying to

I think this is an argument someone could use for lack of consent; if animals don't possess personhood, why do you expect 'consent' to be a meaningful concept for them?

8:10 AM · Jan 20, 2020

Replying to

@qwertyplication

and

Consent isn't meaningful to them. But it is to us.

1

2

Replying to

Why indeed. You’d be happy if a horse took a shine to you then and decided to give you one?