Conversation

Has bestiality always been historically so taboo? Why? It doesn't result in pregnancy; did it result in diseases? Why did humans evolve to get so repulsed from touching genitals with other species?
4,649
720
Replying to
Hi! I know Berkeley has a stereotype but I'm pretty far from the SJW crowd; a few weeks ago I got brigaded by the radical trans crowd who thought I was an alt-right/TERF so idfk what people want from me anymore. I conduct research on sexual taboos:
130
483
Replying to and
So “research” to you is asking random people on Twitter? Because a simple google search would have told you the disease risks. And there’s undoubtedly a ton of scholarly research to be had. TBH it just seems a lot more likely you were attention-seeking.
1
8
Replying to and
Disease != taboo; for example gay people were primary contributors to the aids crisis, but this occurred right at the time that society underwent a significant shift in acceptance (which, for the record, was good, and the AIDS crisis was really terrible).
3
5
Replying to and
No, I'm not drunk. I'm saying that the use of 'disease' as a reason for the taboo is good, but it makes sense to question it, given the existence of other scenarios where disease occurred at the same time as a *reduction* in taboos.
2
4