body { -ms-overflow-style: scrollbar; overflow-y: scroll; overscroll-behavior-y: none; } .errorContainer { background-color: #FFF; color: #0F1419; max-width: 600px; margin: 0 auto; padding: 10%; font-family: Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; } .errorButton { margin: 3em 0; } .errorButton a { background: #1DA1F2; border-radius: 2.5em; color: white; padding: 1em 2em; text-decoration: none; } .errorButton a:hover, .errorButton a:focus { background: rgb(26, 145, 218); } .errorFooter { color: #657786; font-size: 80%; line-height: 1.5; padding: 1em 0; } .errorFooter a, .errorFooter a:visited { color: #657786; text-decoration: none; padding-right: 1em; } .errorFooter a:hover, .errorFooter a:active { text-decoration: underline; } #placeholder, #react-root { display: none !important; } body { background-color: #FFF !important; }

JavaScript is not available.

We’ve detected that JavaScript is disabled in this browser. Please enable JavaScript or switch to a supported browser to continue using twitter.com. You can see a list of supported browsers in our Help Center.

Terms of Service Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Imprint Ads info © 2023 Twitter, Inc.

Conversation

So apparently gay folks are in the same category as beastiality now. Nice take.

Quote Tweet

Replying to @StoicMindful

Yeah, seems close to gay activity tho? Homosexuality was shamed a lot in cultures, but also was approved of in some cultures too.

1

Replying to

Jesus christ. I'm asking why we have cultural taboos around some things. The suggestion of "we have taboo against stuff that can't reproduce" seems not right, because we're ok with gay people now but not bestiality, so that is evidence against that argument.

1

Replying to

Not one single normal human being has ever thought, ‘I wonder why it isn’t socially acceptable to have sex with animals’. Not one. We know why already.

1

Replying to

I've never claimed to be normal, and I must be out of the loop - why did our culture evolve this way? I suggested disease - is that it?

9:44 PM · Jan 19, 2020

Replying to

I’m suggesting that we simply know that it is wrong. Is that not reasonable?