Post hoc consequentialism to me indicates positive.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This answer is gonna differ conditional on them surviving to a meaningful extent or not. E.g., in the Americas, many colonized peoples (if not most) were essentially wiped out, eventually. The question is too complicated to be put in such a reductive form.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Do you mean immediately after being colonized or generations afterwards? Because the first one would likely be considered negative by the people living at the time. As for now. It's impossible to know what it would be like in an alternate universe where it didn't happen.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Aella would make an excellent teacher tbh.
End of conversation
-
-
-
Needs a "Not touching this question with a 10 foot flaming barge pole" option
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Because countries like Japan and Thailand that were never colonized can still adopt the technologies but without the violence and loss of culture.
End of conversation
-
-
-
Cultures or populations? In 500 years cultures either changed almost beyond recognition or were destroyed entirely, but populations... it’s a different story entirely.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Far too complex a question to have a binary good or bad answer and "neutral" is equally useless. Nothing is completely beneficial or deleterious. There's a plethora of variables to weigh.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.