Conversation

"trickle down theory" seems obviously correct to me. Like, if a person has lots of money, it's stupid to sit on it - they invest it, found businesses, hire people, buy things - all of which are putting money back into lower tiers of the economy to me. Am I missing something big?
325
348
Replying to
But that just seems retarded to me. Sitting on money is so dumb I have trouble believing rich people with access to the best financial advisors would do that. Unless the tax burden is discouraging them from reinvesting into the economy?
27
42
Replying to and
"Sitting" on money doesn't mean getting no return. High Frequency Trading adds no real liquidity to the market, doesn't substantively invest in companies operations, and makes shit tons of money. It's almost a lucrative private tax orchestrated against real investors.
4
90
Replying to and
There are a bunch of books about what happened at Enron that are a pretty good reference about making money by "appearing" to have a business and just moving things around. Enron only collapsed because they overreached, and crossed some stupid lines.
2
16
Show replies
Will is right about HFT, but it's a very small component of the financial markets relying on algorithms that crunch miniscule margins out of tiny market inefficiencies — too small to be taken advantantage of except at massive scale. It's zero-sum; too slow, you die.
1
3
Show replies
Replying to and
The shenanigans involved in rearranging money for profit are fascinating and varied. The Panama Papers stuff covers some. Some HFT stuff just isn't public. I once worked at Lehman Bro's Mortgage Capital Division, so I have a slightly skewed perspective.
1
Remember property too, that is the only real wealth. How does anything trickle anywhere when a person owns 20 houses and doesn't rent them out? If they do collect rent then they are just leeching. Wealth trickles up! Not down, think of the value, it comes from workers paying rent