Conversation

"trickle down theory" seems obviously correct to me. Like, if a person has lots of money, it's stupid to sit on it - they invest it, found businesses, hire people, buy things - all of which are putting money back into lower tiers of the economy to me. Am I missing something big?
325
348
Replying to and
Savings in bonds or investing in public companies doesn’t create real value in the real economy. It doesn’t actually grow the pie. Investing in new ventures from the ground up may create value. SpaceX looks like real value to me. But not Uber.
Replying to and
People also seem to be skipping over the fact that generally, to get rich, you have to have created something of value. Whether Bill Gates sits on his hundreds of billions or not isn’t the point, the point is that Microsoft has added far more than that in real value to the world.
1