Provided there are zero strings attached, this is a simple yes.
-
-
-
Anonymous also, if possible. And no further contact with anyone working there, present or future.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
The bad person’s money is going to go SOMEwhere, why not to your organization?
-
Think about this..the money is now being laundered and causing other issues that now need the goodwill of people (more charities potentially) to help combat the new/prolonged issues. Or maybe there are (always are) strings attached, and now the charity is no longer good..
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Easy yes
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Money is already evil anyway.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Damn I wish I could see the data on this mashed up with a MIT/Weinstein question. Framing is so important.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No, because the press will make it public and do harm to the organizations image and thus their ability to do good in the future.
-
I mean all that Nazi gold seems to have worked out for Switzerland...
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I like how thinking bad thoughts is akin to actually hurting people
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.