Conversation

Is it *ever* okay to negatively generalize people based on a group they have no control over belonging to (for a roughly neutral example, "red headed people get angry so fast")? || Is it okay for women to talk about how scared they are of men?
  • Yes || Yes
    58.7%
  • Yes || No
    4.4%
  • No || Yes
    23.4%
  • No || No
    13.5%
2,638 votesFinal results
Replying to
As long as it is true. Negative quality is negative quality. Then having no control over it does not change the reality that it is negative quality. Reality is cruel. Reality does not give a shit about fairness. Reality is indifferent.
4
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Show replies
Replying to
Generalizations are helpful for communicating expediently, but it's good to avoid causing unnecessary offense or reenforcing negative feedback loops. Knowing your audience helps. It's usually safer to take shortcuts with people that already know you and your views well.
1
Replying to
Whether something is ok depends on context and it's going to depend on who is experiencing it. Better questions: what are the effects of doing x and am I ok with those effects. Whether other people are ok with it may or may not figure into it.
Replying to
If done in a rational way generalizing according to groups is useful for predicting probability of behaviour in people. This is done often in insurance and marketing as much as is possible before it conflicts with PR and PC. However people don't always think about it rationally.