Interested in reasons why folks _would_ press the button?
-
-
-
There’s the argument that it’s better to have an existence that can be compared to any other existences (even if it is a comparably worse existence) than to have no existence at all
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Quality of life of the average human is important to improve IMO.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Subjective quality of life not just income?
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Pretty hard sell that you should create life with worse quality of life than the worse we currently have. Quality of life can go pretty low.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Now this question is harder! I think it ends up being a “no,” though, because it’s not my place to play god and artificially create life. However, embedded in your Q is an interesting premise that if these 70 mil people hav basic necessities, yet still comprise those with the...
-
...lowest quality of life, then everyone else’s quality of life would be pretty good, right? Because right now millions of people don’t have what may described as “basic necessities.” So in that case, would I say yes? Hmm...
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
The inconsistency of this and the other poll is interesting and I think mainly due to status quo bias but there is a confound. We know roughly what the current bottom 1% quality of life is. This question places no lower bound on how low the new low is.
-
It’s possible to think the current lowest 1% have lives worth living if just barely, but based on the lack of a lower boundary be unsure if the new 70 million lives would cross that threshold
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.