I think you said “name one prochoicer who —- “. This was my one prochoicer 
for the exceptions, but my point here is just that the 'rule' *requires* exceptions in order to function. Human life is also a kind of weird boundary. Even when I was super pro-life I felt some kind of intuitive stretch when identifying "life at conception" as a human.
-
-
and again - I know you can logically argue this, e.g. "Human is individual living thing with dna and fetuses are different dna from parents". But the first cell union thing isn't recognizeably human to me and I suspect to you either. If hypothetically, deep into the future, we
-
ended up with the tech to generate these fertilized egg things at the very basic level, but with no potential to move forward, and we had a ton of them in a building... it feels weird to treat these things as morally equivalent to 'full human life'. We can also blur the idea of
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Yeah, I’d say the exception would be if the mother’s life was at risk or she was in danger prior to viability. That would be the only exception for a mother killing her unborn child in my prolife view.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.