Would you support a law that required a person to pay 33% of their yearly income upfront as a downpayment towards future childcare expenses for their future child, before getting pregnant? (Assume pregnancy is opt-in in this world)
Conversation
Replying to
I'm not opposed to the general idea but voted no on 33%. The percentage should not be set by law, just can't go through with it until a certain level of pre-care is saved up. Up to the parents how quickly to save it up.
Replying to
Flexibility in how much an individual decides to spend on child care is a factor that makes child care industry competitive.
Foreknowledge that certain portion of money is forced allocated will raise the child care industry price and cause other anomalies.
