I'm not opposed to the general idea but voted no on 33%. The percentage should not be set by law, just can't go through with it until a certain level of pre-care is saved up. Up to the parents how quickly to save it up.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Of course. Superb policy proposal. Why should I subsidize other people's fertility?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Payment beginning once the decision to have a child us made?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Women only. You can opt out by sterilization or marriage
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Flexibility in how much an individual decides to spend on child care is a factor that makes child care industry competitive. Foreknowledge that certain portion of money is forced allocated will raise the child care industry price and cause other anomalies.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Genius idea tbh.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Only people saying No are narcissists.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.