That’s actually my fetish and no one else should have to suffer a life of sexual deprivation due to a lack of legislation
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Wow that question went from 0 to 100 real quick
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This would enable a level of meddling akin to conversation therapy. That's to say nothing of the nebulous nature of what individual parents would discern as 'unusual or bizarre'.
-
This was my reason for voting "forbids".
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I'd be OK with "hard to satisfy safely and consensually", but I feel like my unusual and bizarre sexual fetishes are a blessing that increases my capacity for joy in life. Making law here seems way too fraught either way to vote on in a Twitter poll :)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This raises the broader question of how much sexual fetishes are genetic.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I may be missing the point of the poll, but I find it unlikely that an isolated gene for "bizarre" fetishes exists, so the modification would also affect fetishes and sexuality in a broader way. Make the child asexual, then they won't have any distasteful fetishes. Hooray!
-
Hey, "it's the future" ! ;)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
If we're talking stuff that makes you a serious danger to other people, then allows. For stuff that's just kinda weird and gross, then forbids.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.