Pro-abortion arguments sound sane too. But at the end of the day, it's killing a baby. Anything else is rationalization.
-
-
Replying to @scullytaco @wglane3
Maybe it is killing a baby, but if killing a fetus = killing a baby then i'm fine with mothers killing their babies.
156 replies 14 retweets 51 likes -
Replying to @Aella_Girl @wglane3
Religionists looking to use gov't to protect Souls (whatever those are) blithely ignore that Mothers have the Natural Right to kill their babies. Been doin' it for millenia for a variety of reasons.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
A mother can use self-defense against "the good" authoritarians "back in power" wielding The State to impose on her. Use 2A to defend against infringement of 1A! Natural Rights are one's natural abilities without interference from Gov't. Mothers've had infanticide right 4ever.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Natural Right =ing "non-interference by gov't", then YES. Many cultures wouldn't recognize a newborn as tribe-member unless mother brought it forward to be recognized as under her care/protection. This allowed mother to decide feasibility of raising it.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
IMO the split is over "soul". Those who believe we've a responsibility to protect a fellow human due to their soul & godly dictates valuing such despise abortion/infanticide. Those who see god/soul notions as invalid can see the issue as one of societal respect towards mother.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
I'm more likely to buy into concepts that I can take apart and figure out what they're made of. Soul is a concept that, when I take it apart, it seems to disappear completely, so I don't really use it.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.