Maybe it is killing a baby, but if killing a fetus = killing a baby then i'm fine with mothers killing their babies.
This Tweet is from a suspended account. Learn more
Conversation
This Tweet is from a suspended account. Learn more
Replying to
For... abortion? Maybe I'm missing your point here, I don't understand the similarity.
1
This Tweet is from a suspended account. Learn more
Replying to
Ah I understand. Still though, you could take that exact same argument and reverse it - you're arguing for the evil of "removing agency from a woman's body" and everything you say about it is just rationalizing.
4
This Tweet is from a suspended account. Learn more
Replying to
Right. I mean, I used to believe this - I used to protest planned parenthood even. I think your view is a logical extension of some type of philosophy about 'murder' and 'person' and 'rights'. I think the issue lies in the underlying philosophy, not in the logical extension.
1
Replying to
As in, it feels really weird to say that upon the moment of conception, the thing is a full person with the right to live. Like, there's plenty of animals with way more cognitive capacity and ability to feel pain that pro-life and pro-choice people alike are fine with killing.
2
5
Replying to
We seem to collectively have an idea of 'right to llive' with something something humanity, or pain-feelingness, or 'surviving-ness. It's pretty unclear where the border is. The religious pro-life view imbues humanity with Special Soul-ness from the get-go, which is complicated
1
3
Replying to
Cause if I'm gonna buy into the Special Soulness then I have to buy into a lot of other stuff that's pretty hard for me to swallow and doesn't really make intuitive sense to me.
But I agree pro-choicers do claim there is Specialness but don't know where to draw the line.
Replying to
This was a more revealing dialogue than the post itself. The main point proves that we’re not that different, in thinking or practice, we’re just validated differently.
1