Pro-abortion arguments sound sane too. But at the end of the day, it's killing a baby. Anything else is rationalization.
-
-
That's fair. With medical advances, abortion should be obsolete in the future anyway, hopefully making the entire argument moot. I'm not religious but do not support any taking of human life. People 100 years from now will look at our treatment of animals as equally barbaric.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This was a more revealing dialogue than the post itself. The main point proves that we’re not that different, in thinking or practice, we’re just validated differently.
-
You compared animals to babies, “right to live” as being complicated, etc. Just to play devils advocate, is that a fair comparison? How is a right to be free more important than a right to live? By your reasoning slavery seems like a more morale choice.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
