A lot of childrearing that was normal from 50 years ago is currently considered child abuse. Did people 50 years ago consider childrearing from 100 years ago to be child abuse?
-
-
I agree, "abuse" could be a new framework, reflecting new views about authority (before, parental/clerical/etc. authority knew now bounds, hence un-abusable.) But: I can see specific shifts, e.g. one-child per family in China has blown away the idea that children care
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
for their elders in a single generation, since the burden that used to fall on three or four children would now fall on one (tip--invest in assisted living in China.) But I find it hard to react to "very probable" that "almost everything" will be considered "barbaric"--
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
...I'd ask for sharper definitions and rationales...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.