Whether it was an evolutionary biological development or not, civilization pegged men as expendable. That's not the same thing as disposable (useless), but an expendle asset--even an essential one--isn't seen as needing complexity. We're therefore reluctant to acknowledge any.https://twitter.com/Aella_Girl/status/1189610853936455680 …
I also like this theory but feel an unknown hesitance around it. The "Moving towards manness is better and away from manness is worse" seems like a good theory, and "survival habits = less flexibility, thrive = more" also seems like good theory. I want them to unite.
-
-
I'm not sure I completely understand the distinction you're making. Can you rephrase?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.