Not a feminist at all. I love men.
-
-
-
Not mutually exclusive.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I exclude people who think objective reality must change for them (because it should for no one), or only see their freedoms, but the duties of other people but themselves. Besides that, of course, I don't exclude people because of their job or their (chosen) sex.
-
Thinking that objective reality must change for us is what makes humans distinct from other animals.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
TERFs successfully convincing everyone that TERF is a slur is as ingenious as it is baffling
-
Idk, don't things become slurs when they're used as insults? Doesn't all it take for something to become a slur is for it to develop a connotation of disgust or hatred or something?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I want people to be able to fashion their identities to match how they "feel". This often feels at odds with how I feel body autonomy should have primacy, because identity resides in those around us. Who am I to insist that you think of me a certain way? This remains unresolved.
-
The idea of changing your body to match how you feel and the idea of your identity residing in those around you seem completely compatible to me. If changing yourself results in changes in the way people see you, that's fine and matches stuff like 'growing up' or wahtever
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
TERF isn't a slur, but they are a vile group who deserve to have a slur invented for them.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not radical, otherwise both.
-
(this is how I see myself, although depending on what you mean by "exclude", you might classify me differently)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.