Ok: My idea of philosophy, or whatever word you want to use that matches this concept, is some category of thinking that asks about abstract stuff with reasoning, but deeply takes into account *the thing doing the asking*; I want to see a norm where meta-awareness
-
-
“Making itself intelligible is suicide for philosophy.” “The most thought-provoking thing in our thought-provoking time is that we are still not thinking.” ― Martin Heidegger
-
The genius is more often in the questions than the answers.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Cool story. Have you checked out Zizek
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
All right, Aella, that was hot!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Maybe the problem is bigger. Nowadays to be ready to move science forward you need to know and to be aware of too much of data. 12 grades of school, then college, bachelor, master, doctorate degree. And the amount of knowledge the humanity is keeping is huge and growing fast.
-
Some of the responses to that is sorta naive approach where we all trying to just feel things and not to be a all-knowing machine. The cybersociety is searching the ways of keeping its humanity.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.