body { -ms-overflow-style: scrollbar; overflow-y: scroll; overscroll-behavior-y: none; } .errorContainer { background-color: #FFF; color: #0F1419; max-width: 600px; margin: 0 auto; padding: 10%; font-family: Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; } .errorButton { margin: 3em 0; } .errorButton a { background: #1DA1F2; border-radius: 2.5em; color: white; padding: 1em 2em; text-decoration: none; } .errorButton a:hover, .errorButton a:focus { background: rgb(26, 145, 218); } .errorFooter { color: #657786; font-size: 80%; line-height: 1.5; padding: 1em 0; } .errorFooter a, .errorFooter a:visited { color: #657786; text-decoration: none; padding-right: 1em; } .errorFooter a:hover, .errorFooter a:active { text-decoration: underline; } #placeholder, #react-root { display: none !important; } body { background-color: #FFF !important; }

JavaScript is not available.

We’ve detected that JavaScript is disabled in this browser. Please enable JavaScript or switch to a supported browser to continue using twitter.com. You can see a list of supported browsers in our Help Center.

Terms of Service Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Imprint Ads info © 2023 Twitter, Inc.

Conversation

We often like to frame our ideas as subversive or 'hated by society' - but how do we tell? My favorite test is, "can your idea be used to sell a product?" If advertisers would use your concept or advertise alongside it, then your idea isn't subversive.

21

108

394

This Tweet is from a suspended account. Learn more

Replying to

...what? i don't understand what you're saying. I'm saying that advertisers only use what isn't contentious. I agree that the discussion around Greta and sex trafficking is contentious.

3

2

This Tweet is from a suspended account. Learn more

Level of Analysis

@LevelOAnalysis

Replying to

and

So... what? What are you talking about? I'm not saying that as like a mere put down, I mean your chain of thought is not followable.

2

1

@EmperorGrinnar

Replying to

@LevelOAnalysis

and

She's agreeing and supporting that if a minor addresses the UN, then they're magically good to go with being forced into sex slavery.

1

Level of Analysis

@LevelOAnalysis

Replying to

@EmperorGrinnar

and

I think Aella was supporting the idea that 16 year olds probably aren't mature enough to say anything worth hearing on climate change. Not that magic and sorcery exist.

2

1

@EmperorGrinnar

Replying to

@LevelOAnalysis

and

Not if you read all of her replies on the thread. The point of me saying magic was hyperbole, by the way. Pointing out a lapse in judgement on her behalf.

1

Level of Analysis

@LevelOAnalysis

Replying to

@EmperorGrinnar

and

I know what Aella thinks about stuff like this. I've talked to her in real life. She thinks that maybe we have weird inconsistent concepts about maturity and we should think about that. She's not trying to say your heinous strawman.

2

1

@EmperorGrinnar

Replying to

@LevelOAnalysis

and

And yet she defended saying that children who speak at the UN should be okay to be fixed into sex slavery. 🤷‍♂️

1

Replying to

@EmperorGrinnar

@LevelOAnalysis

and

I literally do not think 16 year olds should be fixed into sex slavery.

4:46 PM · Sep 27, 2019

@EmperorGrinnar

Replying to

@LevelOAnalysis

and

May want to review your comments.

1

1