My ideal system (and one I'd like to move towards, politically), is where the incentive structure of the system is such that the natural incentives you have to fill your own needs, *also* results in others getting their needs met, as naturally and organically as possible.
-
-
That a good system is something that arises outside of our attempt to control it. So how do we allow this extremely complex, organic system to arise? Well the basic guideline, heavily simplified, is something like "Don't control anyone but yourself."
Show this thread -
We've already got a lot of this down - we all agree that assaulting someone or stealing their food or something is bad, and there's heavy norms, both social and legal, to incentivize against doing that. But there's a huge amount of control that we have accepted as normal.
Show this thread -
The intense internal control of religious communities, or the default of monogamy, or anti-abortion laws, or rules against busking or selling wares, or anti-sex work laws, or bureaucratic hoops, or drug approval laws, or single-family-home zoning, or even taxes.
Show this thread -
The thought of getting rid of all control might seem utterly terrifying, and probably rightly so. But I really think that the system, if we just left it the fuck alone, would become something more complex, more unique, more scary, more beautiful, and ultimately better for all.
Show this thread -
Because so many of our problems today that terrify us are caused, at their very root, by the effects of control. Black poverty comes from the roots of slavery. Homelessness trickles down from housing laws and opiate companies. Healthcare costs come from regulatory insanity.
Show this thread -
Of course this can't happen overnight. If we suddenly abandoned all laws there would be anarchy. And there's definitely still grey areas (what counts as control?) and I'm a little confused about how this relates to other countries who might one day want to eat us.
Show this thread -
But I'd love to see us all breathe, take a step back, and start loosening our white-knuckled grip on reality, just a tad. People know what they need, for themselves, and if you let them get it in the best way they know how, we might start seeing the system provide for itself.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
But humans can only interact together if they can agree upon rules of engagement that are mutually suitable. How do you get large groups to coordinate without stating those norms? Everyone interprets things differently, leading to confusion when expectations differ from reality
-
It seems to me that it’s quite beneficial for groups to be as explicit as possible about their rules (goals & values) so that they can hold each other accountable and manage expectations. Of course centralized authorship/ admin of these rules must be avoided, but still...
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Fractal Localism
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.