That's just your arbitrary standard. Also, your surrogate egg donor supports my argument. Surrogate egg donors usually have no right or obligations to the child.
-
-
Replying to @eui_says @Aella_Girl
Umm, what country do you live in? In the USA, this is the law.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Oh and you're a gun nut? Bye.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bc_Sanders @Aella_Girl
Where in U.S. law does it say an egg donor has custody right and child support obligation for a child who is being raised by another couple for just donating an egg?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @eui_says @Aella_Girl
Of course you can't answer. No sane couple would get an egg doner to get a child if the egg doner can claim right over the resulting child. No sane egg donor would donate an egg to a couple if the donor can be demanded of child support payment for giving the egg.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @eui_says @Aella_Girl
No, gun nut, I've moved on. Not egg donor, surrogate; not sperm donor, intercourse partner. If I said, 'donate' I erred, but I clearly said SURROGATE.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bc_Sanders @Aella_Girl
Sue in your example is a false analogy, because donating an egg to a surrogate means Sue already decided to want a child. That is different from people having sex with no intention of having a child.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @eui_says @Aella_Girl
Just say agree to disagree. this is boring. You think somehow the decision to have a child or not absolves a person from responsibility if they do the action that produces a child. I don't. bye.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bc_Sanders @eui_says
Can I have sliiightly more respect in conversations in my mentions, I like propagating norms in my tweet comments of treating the other person kindly
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Yes. Also including context.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.