When it comes to conspiracy theories, I have a few rules: 1. If I were the conspirator, what would be the most sensible thing to do? 2. Things are more complicated and nuanced than they seem 3. Irrationality and mistakes exist. If a narrative is too clean, then it's suspicious.
-
-
For 9/11: 1. Would false flagging actually be the best way to get oil (or whatever else I wanted?) 2. Pulling something off of that magnitude yourself without people knowing would be really complicated 3. It's possible everybody was just stupid and negligent
Show this thread -
I like the 9/11-was-an-inside-job conspiracy theory, I think it's one of my favorites. But the narrative around the conspiracy feels a little suspiciously clean to me. If I imagine being the mastermind behind it, it starts to feel closer to a thriller movie.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The Clintons have survived this long with plenty of suspicion just fine. All they care about is plausible deniability.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Epstein hits lots of "coincidence" heuristics, but 1 isn't right. Suiciding isn't to reduce suspicion, cause cases need more than that - it's destroying evidence. Besides, conspirators could be anyone, folk point to Trump, Arkancide or CIA but unknown billionaires could benefit.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.