I feel a little weird when people talk about 'rights' that require someone else doing something for us, like 'rights' that require someone else's labor to be fulfilled. I mostly feel my rights are to a *lack* of interference from others - e.g. a right to freely express.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Which problem? That social media is not deemed as a public space or that it is a safe space. 8Chan recently got took down which I think was ok to take down and the people in it could hold the same argument as yours. Splitting hairs in good faith here.
End of conversation
-
-
-
I'm inclined to think there should be fundamental rights, which are things you don't depend on others for, such as your speech, bodily autonomy, etc. Then there might be another set of rights that you get when you're in a society well enough off. Healthcare would be an example.
-
Basically, the minimum set of rights would increase with time and societal progress. I'm sure some would argue with my calling these "rights". They might suggest "privilege" but that seems too weak to me. If we have to come up with a new word for this intermediate, then so be it.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.