I feel a little weird when people talk about 'rights' that require someone else doing something for us, like 'rights' that require someone else's labor to be fulfilled. I mostly feel my rights are to a *lack* of interference from others - e.g. a right to freely express.
-
-
Under capitalism it does only on expansion of economic cycles. And only in specific geographical areas of the world. And only by increasingly shifting the load on environment@other animals. And also by taking in other benefits that shouldn't really be connected to the economy.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Ans even with "good" % the threat is very present. So yes, the idea of "basic rights that just don't need interference" roots in essentialising naturalism, forgetting society, property relations and for profit dinamics etc
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.