body { -ms-overflow-style: scrollbar; overflow-y: scroll; overscroll-behavior-y: none; } .errorContainer { background-color: #FFF; color: #0F1419; max-width: 600px; margin: 0 auto; padding: 10%; font-family: Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; } .errorButton { margin: 3em 0; } .errorButton a { background: #1DA1F2; border-radius: 2.5em; color: white; padding: 1em 2em; text-decoration: none; } .errorButton a:hover, .errorButton a:focus { background: rgb(26, 145, 218); } .errorFooter { color: #657786; font-size: 80%; line-height: 1.5; padding: 1em 0; } .errorFooter a, .errorFooter a:visited { color: #657786; text-decoration: none; padding-right: 1em; } .errorFooter a:hover, .errorFooter a:active { text-decoration: underline; } #placeholder, #react-root { display: none !important; } body { background-color: #FFF !important; }

JavaScript is not available.

We’ve detected that JavaScript is disabled in this browser. Please enable JavaScript or switch to a supported browser to continue using twitter.com. You can see a list of supported browsers in our Help Center.

Terms of Service Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Imprint Ads info © 2023 Twitter, Inc.

Conversation

If you could, would you change the percentage ratio of gender of new births from here on out?

Yes - more males
3.7%
Yes - more females
36.1%
No change
60.2%

1,758 votesFinal results

12

2

9

You’re unable to view this Tweet because this account owner limits who can view their Tweets. Learn more

@mr_mindfulnesss

Replying to

and

“More females = men would gain significantly more power across the board” Do you mind elaborating that? I’m confused

1

1

You’re unable to view this Tweet because this account owner limits who can view their Tweets. Learn more

This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more

Replying to

I sorta support that argument tho, if I support it does it make it a female argument?

9:55 PM · Aug 12, 2019

@mr_mindfulnesss

Replying to

and

It makes it a sorta female argument I believe

1

4