I'm really interested in the tradeoffs between agency and safety. Most people report they'd rather have agency over safety, but I suspect this means that lack of agency feels closer/more threatening than lack of safety. How much safety would give up before a loss of freedom?
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
Replying to @demonlordnaraku
We adapt to deal with risks in the environment. Adapting to a risk that never presents in the environment is a waste of energy, and therefore is 'less safe.'
9:21 PM - 18 Jun 2019
1 reply
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.