ideal regulations are necessarily preferable to ideal freedom (if you prioritize the comfort of the many over the comfort of the few)
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If they are geniuses, they *won't* double regulations. Because they can see how to abstract, merge, and optimise existing ones. (Less regulations is generally better because they are more likely to be followed and enforced.)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think many people (seems like roughly 1/4 of respondents) are failing to understand that you can reduce the amount of regulations without reducing the effect of them, given the right language. It's like Jenga, you can remove useless blocks without destroying the structure.
-
...given the right language
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Halve. Generally speaking, the simpler a system is the more effective and efficient it is.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If you start with 10 regulations, are the halvers choosing 5 of them to keep, or are they writing whatever 5 they want but ending at 5 total? If they have flexibility to write them, halving is a lot more tempting than if they're just deleting.
-
The idea is that the halvers would remove the 5 worst ones.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.