The richest 1% have always been the direct or indirect cause of the vast majority of human suffering. This ought to be a no-brainer.
-
-
-
You will be basically killing all first world countries by killing 25% of the rich people. Someone making minimum wage in the US is making about 7 times as much as someone making minimum wage in Mexico.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Eliminate the richest 25%, distribute their wealth, world hunger conquered.
-
Yeah but also world hunger is probably contained in the poorest 25%, so same effect.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I think people are imagining "kill off the billionaires" and not "kill off nearly all inhabitants of first world countries and 90% of people with graduate degrees" when they select "richest".
-
hah, yeah this one was a no-brainer to kill off the poor. Pretty much all of the other polls I attempt to proxy onto this one
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Just so everyone is clear, if you make more than $34k a year you are in the world's top 1%
-
Whoa. So if I select “richest” then my friends and family become the richest people in the world!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The poor will always be with you. So killing them won't matter as much.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
how do you feel about euthanasia?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.