That's a tricky premise. There are accepted standards for an intelligence quotient (IQ) for a "genius". People do try and cite "EQ" or "Emotional Intelligence" as a metric but for all the flack IQ gets, EQ lacks empirical backing by an even insurmountable margin.
-
-
-
You're right, i generally agree with this. What I'm trying to get at, though, is what if you identify the skills/type of attention most correlated with gender, and then turn the knob on those all the way up? For men you'd get something like great math skills, and for women?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
How would you classify Machiavellianism?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Idiot too, eh?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
There’s layers of questions here—are femininity and masculinity possible outside what is considered to be stereotypically so? If so, is that kind of femininity compatible with genius? If not, can we say genius is more masculine even if that connection isn’t analytic?
-
(By “analytic” here I mean true in definitional terms, or, if you like, true in every possible world. I mention this because the link that you see—the higher variance—is an empirical connection, and is thus subject to consideration about whether it is a given or not.)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Men just have had better access to education historically.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.