Trained by a man named Pavlov?
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
-
-
Insofar as it is possible to dispose of the plushie, that would be okay. If it was ‘I will tattoo you’ it would be doubly imposing. IMHO.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I am probably not thinking large enough but does anyone have an example of something morally wrong that is consensual with all parties involved?
-
we might think something like intentionally offering someone you know to be a recovering alcoholic a tempting drink of alcohol is immoral, though no consent is violated and there's no punishment for refusal
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Wait, what? Consent-less unnecessary surgery seems worse that consent-full unnecessary surgery. How do you come to your conclusion?
End of conversation
-
-
-
Depends on the topic and choices. "Buy this chocolate and you get a kiss from your crush" Is less stressing then "Kill your significant other and your best friend lives"
-
If the person is actively threatening to kill the best friend, then I wouldn't consider this as a qualifying choice, because there's a consent violation. However, if the best friend is *already* dying due to other forces, then I would consider this example as qualifying.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Offering to buy a drug addict's fingers is probably bad. They might accept even if you don't violate consent and you don't punish them. Similarly, if someone kidnapped that person's child and demanded a big ransom, it might be bad to offer them a loan.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.