Conversation

Can giving someone additional choice ever be bad? e.g. "If you fly to australia I will give you a scorpion plushie". GIVEN: no consent is violated (I am not stealing the plushie) and there's no punishment if refused ("you said no? Now i'm gonna mail you a box of live scorpions")
  • Yes, it can be bad
    59.4%
  • No, that can't be bad
    40.6%
510 votesFinal results
Replying to
If the person is actively threatening to kill the best friend, then I wouldn't consider this as a qualifying choice, because there's a consent violation. However, if the best friend is *already* dying due to other forces, then I would consider this example as qualifying.
1
2
Show replies
Replying to
If you're talking strictly choice, how would prefer to be killed? Drowning, stabbing, hanging, shooting. Lots of choices, all of them bad in my opinion. Note that not dying is not a choice.
1
Replying to
If I'm already going to die and it's inevitable, I'm definitely going to die by fire, and someone comes along and is like "Hey, you could also drown too maybe?" that seems like a good thing to me.
1
Show replies
Replying to
Making choices expends time and effort. Filling up someone’s life with too many choices forces them to make that expenditure. Imagine if life were a Chinese restaurant and you always had a thousand choices. You’d give up dining!
Replying to
my go to example is circumcision: both ofalternatives decided upon by parents w/o child's consent are better than giving him the additional choice when he's older.
1
Replying to
Offering to buy a drug addict's fingers is probably bad. They might accept even if you don't violate consent and you don't punish them. Similarly, if someone kidnapped that person's child and demanded a big ransom, it might be bad to offer them a loan.
1