The symlink requirement for classic snaps (and classic confinement is viewed by snapd lead @gniemeyer as transitional, as I understand it, pending all snaps being able to use strict confinement) is described on the snappy Fedora install pagehttps://docs.snapcraft.io/installing-snap-on-fedora/6755 …
Is this how @linuxfoundation intended the FHS be changed? To be fair, it is listed merely as a reference, so a violation of FHS might not be a problem at all and Arch and Fedora would be wrong to cite that as a reason for rejecting it? https://wiki.linuxfoundation.org/lsb/fhs
-
-
Most distributions, including Ubuntu, use it as an important guideline. But there's a chicken and egg problem when updating such specs: we couldn't prove it was relevant without making it relevant.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.