I show that PCP visits decline by 17% after a PCP retires or relocates. Patients compensate for the loss of a PCP by relying on pre-existing specialists for primary care long-term.pic.twitter.com/QOyxn0kFCK
U tweetove putem weba ili aplikacija drugih proizvođača možete dodati podatke o lokaciji, kao što su grad ili točna lokacija. Povijest lokacija tweetova uvijek možete izbrisati. Saznajte više
I show that PCP visits decline by 17% after a PCP retires or relocates. Patients compensate for the loss of a PCP by relying on pre-existing specialists for primary care long-term.pic.twitter.com/QOyxn0kFCK
Patients with longer relationships are more likely to switch to specialists long-termpic.twitter.com/yY0GXskHHt
Patients in team clinics are less likely to switch to specialistspic.twitter.com/hiPpmlMhgf
Regardless of the length of the relationship or the clinic environment, very few patients form new relationships (10 pp increase)pic.twitter.com/sYbEKELRAX
Isn’t that consistent with a model where there’s no patient knowledge accumulation with team based care and the care is just worse?
I don't totally understand your question. Could you expand?
Cystic fibrosis here and fiancee has LAM, recently relocated. We have no relationship with PCP other than for referrals to our long term specialists. But they are nice & understanding that our HC needs are better served under one tent .
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.