You know what’s great? When something seems very questionable but academics seem to unilaterally accept it without criticism.
-
-
Tacitus was writing in the first century AD. Snorri Sturluson was writing in the thirteenth. There is an issue here. Snorri May have represented truths about Odin but this should not be accepted without discussion.
Show this thread -
Only book I’ve seen criticise this is in German.
Show this thread -
Mercury may well have been Odin in Tacitus' Germania, but since he never went there, we don't know his German sources.
Show this thread -
On top of that, he is directly quoting Caesar, who was actually talking about Gauls worshipping Mercury, not Germans. So Tacitus may be way off the mark here and had no clue.
Show this thread -
Basically, the theory is this: Mercury was a psychopomp (leader of the dead to the afterlife) and a god of commerce. Odin in the later sources is ID'd with the dead and one of his epithets is the god of cargoes. But again, HUGE time diff between this info.
Show this thread -
There are earlier mentions of Odin/Woden (still several centuries removed from Tacitus) but these are more vague. There is one (ONE) source from the 7th c that equates Odin and Mercury. Again, written long time after, and by an Italian Christian monk composing a saint's life.
Show this thread -
Specifically, Jonas of Bobbio writing the life of St Columbanus.
Show this thread -
What would the source be for this? Maybe Jonas was thinking of the days of the week (dies Mercurii and Woden's Day)? The middle day of the week was not necessarily so named because the two gods were thought to be the same.
Show this thread -
But even if by the 7th c. Christian authors believed them to be the same, it doesn't mean that Tacitus meant that either.
Show this thread -
Always be critical of your sources, folks.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.