One of the things about Annika Larsson and band 6 from Birka 965 that bugs me is that we'll never know wtf is going on in her head.
-
Show this thread
-
I just want one textile savvy journalist to ask her how she reconciles the intact weft turning loops w her claims it was wider.
3 replies 0 retweets 7 likesShow this thread -
She claims to be a textile expert, she has to know therefore that both those things can't be true.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likesShow this thread -
And yet in this NYT article Larsson implies the only reason you'd reject her findings is you're a white supremacist. https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/10/14/world/europe/vikings-allah-sweden.html …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
So she's done the thing where she's making a physically impossible claim for Band 6 from Birka 965 & only Nazis disagree.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 likeShow this thread -
This makes me EXTREMELY skeptical of her claims for the tablet woven band from Boat 36. Very extremely side eye.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likesShow this thread -
Has she published a paper? I can't imagine one making it through a peer review of anyone familiar with Band 6.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likesShow this thread
Can't find her on JSTOR but who knows
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.