that's my other issue with shipping, is that two men can't be affectionate and close and friendly without ppl assuming they are boning
-
-
Replying to @AdmiralHip
justification for this is: IF IT WAS A MAN AND A WOMAN THEY'D ASSUME IT WAS ROMANTIC. yeah that doesn't make that right, either.
1 reply 2 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @AdmiralHip
like i want to see queer relationships on shows. but saying that two men who have a close relationship are NOT canonically gay or bi...
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @AdmiralHip
isn't immediately bad, I think? like these are people who get mad at the term "bromance" but at the same time refuse to acknowledge...
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @AdmiralHip
that two men can have a relationship that is close and where they might even enjoy physical intimacy i.e. hugging w/e without being gay
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @AdmiralHip
and god forbid you acknowledge that the characters MAY IN FACT be queer but not for each other
1 reply 2 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @AdmiralHip
"well if they WERE gay they'd have to be together, look at how close they are!" why, because gay men can only have romances/sexual partners
4 replies 2 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @AdmiralHip
@AdmiralHip 2 gay folk don't always have to be each other's partners just as 2 black people may not be romantically compatible1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @angelsscream
@angelsscream yeah exactly, like sharing a part of your identity does not mean suddenly you are compatible with them.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@angelsscream it really seems to just be saying, well y'all are the SAME so you must all be into each other. idk it's fucked
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.