@civilwarbore any time someone claims "historical accuracy" it's usually to defend them being ahistorical.
-
-
Replying to @AdmiralHip
@AdmiralHip it was the paleo diet & neo-pagans that started me off tonight, heh. Wouldn't have a prob w either except NOT HISTORICAL1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NeolithicSheep
@civilwarbore oh my god fucking paleo people I swear to fuck1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AdmiralHip
@civilwarbore and neo-pagans...man I am sick of their shit lol.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AdmiralHip
@civilwarbore I'd be fine with both too but many of them take a very self-righteous attitude about history and the past1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AdmiralHip
@civilwarbore when most of them have the most ass-backwards ideas about that stuff anyway2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AdmiralHip
@AdmiralHip seriously. "Paleolithic" is so broad a term temporally & geographically as to be meaningless in terms of diet.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NeolithicSheep
@civilwarbore YES. Plus, there are just too many unknowns. I mean we have revised our ideas about hunter/gatherers and agriculture a lot1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @AdmiralHip
@AdmiralHip also this idea that our digestive systems stopped evolving at some arbitrary point in the past. NO.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@civilwarbore SERIOUSLY.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.