@civilwarbore nice!
-
-
Replying to @AdmiralHip
@AdmiralHip they're very...opaque. literary expectations have shifted a lot in the past thousand years or so.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NeolithicSheep
@AdmiralHip but yeah the one advantage to freelance amateur history studies is I can be multi-disciplinary and flit about like a magpie.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NeolithicSheep
@civilwarbore social and cultural history needs to rely on archaeology, art history, literature, etc. to make sense of anything1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AdmiralHip
@AdmiralHip Yes! But without social & cultural history, archaeology (e.g.) is just dead dry lists of artifacts.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NeolithicSheep
@civilwarbore lmfao omg I know a few archaeologists who would be so mad at that1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AdmiralHip
@civilwarbore but they shit on history for being "close-minded" and only about the written word so w/e1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AdmiralHip
@AdmiralHip if you have time to read Britain BC by Pryor, it's awesome. He's an archaeologist who lets his imagination play but flags it.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NeolithicSheep
@civilwarbore I'll look it up. I've seen Pryor on TV in the UK, he was rather...eccentric shall we say lol1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AdmiralHip
@AdmiralHip yeah he's an eccentric dude. But then he's an archaeologist who believes social culture is important. Weirdo. ;)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.