History is interpretive but I mean if a historian today is spouting shit that we have known to be wrong for 40 years then idek.
-
-
Replying to @AdmiralHip
@AdmiralHip …http://0519f170a2731643c0a9-ec45ee3cb118921cf5758d3a3db775b7.r83.cf1.rackcdn.com/166afcc85aaa1dec7daa2959718d4a05af53b04d.jpg__846x0_q80.jpg … minotaauuuurs1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @robothyenas
@AdmiralHip Is there *any* element of Roman-era Scotland tribes culture that could conceivably be extrapolated into: "wears cow skulls"1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @robothyenas
@Khazar222 No. Not even from the Paleolithic era. In the Iron Age and Early Medieval Period, they revered bulls but in carved art.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AdmiralHip
@AdmiralHip That big leap mighta worked if the rest of the game was also ridiculous (it is but isn't because it takes itself VERY serious)2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @robothyenas
@Khazar222 I mean the Romans called the Picts "Picts" cuz of their alleged body art but their own depictions have them wearing clothes.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@Khazar222 regional differences existed but I mean they weren't exceptionally "barbaric"
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.