@AdmiralHip I was actually thinking of non-writers, not people who are asked to include them, even
-
-
Replying to @NoSleepOlivia
@AdmiralHip like, people who TWs *literally have no relevance to* in any possible way2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NoSleepOlivia
@ashtonraze sigh. I actually saw someone say that a lot of TWs were "fake" or trivialized actual TWs1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @NoSleepOlivia
@ashtonraze well like...if someone says tw: candy or whatever, something silly1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AdmiralHip
@AdmiralHip oh right, I see, yeah. I mean, some can be almost certainly needless, sure, but even they aren't actually harmful.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NoSleepOlivia
@ashtonraze well they were saying it trivializes serious TWs which I can see buuuuut like usually ppl who make light of TWs are those....1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AdmiralHip
@AdmiralHip As someone with a very obscure trigger word that most people wouldn't consider triggering, I feel that's too subjective tbh4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NoSleepOlivia
@AdmiralHip like, legit trigger warnings I mean. Anyone who's being legit probably has a good reason for whatever trigger warning they use1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NoSleepOlivia
@AdmiralHip so unless it's an actual troll, then I'd rather support even seemingly unusual trigger warnings1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@ashtonraze same, which is how this argument I had with that person I mentioned started
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.