And maybe they have more of this at the museum itself but if you are doing public engagement it is necessary to acknowledge this. 2/
-
-
Show this thread
-
And maybe this doesn’t occur to an average person looking at their Twitter account because the nature of this museum is essentially taxidermy. 3/
Show this thread -
But they have not only currently endangered and (I believe) extinct animals in their collection, the acquisition of these were not donated by their countries of origin. They were acquired through trophy hunting. 4/
Show this thread -
And I am thoroughly unsettled about how this museum presents their collection, especially considering how often the extinction of animals is tied white settlers and colonialists exploiting the natural resources of these places. 5/
Show this thread -
Anyone who lives in Ireland will probably know what museum I am talking about and they may well know more than me about how they deal with this legacy in the physical space but ignoring this on Twitter is I think inappropriate. 6/
Show this thread -
And I think that anyone who works with heritage in some way has a responsibility to acknowledge the trauma that is attached to their collections. 7/7
Show this thread -
Addendum: my point here is that natural history is not a neutral discipline and it is just as rooted in racism, imperialism, and colonialism as other disciplines.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It's been a long time since I was there, but I really felt like I had just gone into a big room of taxodermied animals and not a museum. Definitely needed a lot more context, but then again, it's been over ten years since I was there.
-
I think that is basically it, from how I understand it. And one of the reasons why I have not gone.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.