Question for #medievaltwitter, if you were citing a book that is for an archaeological excavation listed with a single author but each chapter might have been written by someone else (like Bruce-Mitford's Sutton Hoo Ship-Burial) do you just cite it as a single author monograph?
-
Show this thread
-
I ask because a lot of arch books and papers used author date, but I am using long-form footnotes so I need to be able to cite these properly but I am not sure which is more appropriate.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @AdmiralHip
I would likely treat the "monograph author" as an editor or organizer for citation purposes.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @medievaljuliana
I thought about this, but they are never cited as an editor elsewhere.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AdmiralHip
Interesting... I don't think I've had to deal with this sort of report before, all archaeology papers I've cited have full list authors (but they are not the type of work you're mentioning here), I would love to hear what you come up with.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Yeah if a work is a paper or excavation report then usually all the authors are listed but this is always cited as a single author monograph, so it's hard to know what to do here.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.